Any modification to a future "Resource Management Act" should preference community groups to maintain the status quo of the current environment.?
|
On average, everyone disagrees with nonconsensus between 201 voters. |
|
Please read the comments from other voters below, then scroll down make your decision. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Any modification to a future "Resource Management Act" should preference community groups to maintain the status quo of the current environment.
You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.
Reasons To DisagreeShould not preference anybody 10 August 2007
Dumb Q - any modification should be rational and not favour anybody! 17 February 2008
|
Reasons To AgreeNeutral becase the question doesnt quite suit my position. Communities should have the right to determine how their environment is changed and affected by change. Any act, resource management or otherwise should give power to communities to stop development where they do not want it or limit it to levels that are acceptable to that community. Big developers with lots of money should not simply be able to overide the desires of the community whose lives will be affected by the developers actions. Developers should not be able to take communities to court to push ahead with unwanted developments - again, money pushing people around! We can afford it, you can't so we'll win seems to be the message many communities are left with today. The progress and development of the community should be up to the community - that is what democracy is. Where there is a majority opposed to development that development should cease - end of story. 17 October 2006
|
Reasons for Remain Neutral
No reasons have yet been given to remain neutral.My View
You can make your comments once you have voted.
You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.
Back to all voting categories
or
Back to "Resource Management Act"
