Jesus was a man who once walked on the earth irrespective of divine status?

On average, everyone strongly agrees with nonconsensus between 403 voters.

Reasons To Disagree

We have absolutely no evidence that the person described in the bible existed. If you disagree, do your research--you'll be surprised. The person who says "historians agree on this" needs to do some more reading. It's also possible that the story of Jesus in the bible was at least partially plagiarised from other popular religions of the time. The evidence suggests Jesus is a fiction.

There is no real proof - the bible does not count as proof, it was made up.

Reasons To Agree

Irrespective of your belief that any God exists or that Jesus is the sun of God, there is still significant evidence that a man named Jesus once walked the earth and had a profound effect on all history every since that time, even if he could have been a false prophet.

History tells us this is so

Almost all historians agree on this. Divine status was conferred on him by later generations, and made a matter of doctrine during the 4th century.

The Romans and Jews both recorded Jesus' crucifixion. Regardless of his divinity, Jesus definitely was a man.

There is more written documentation on the life of Jesus than there is on the life of Julius Caesar

There is enough evidence to suggest that a person by that name to which the Christian faith has attached divinity did exist. Just as much such evidence as there was of many other historical figures around that time.