Residential rubbish collection should be paid for by general rates, not by purchasing special rubbish bags.?
|
On average, everyone agrees with significant nonconsensus between 212 voters. |
|
Please read the comments from other voters below, then scroll down make your decision. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Residential rubbish collection should be paid for by general rates, not by purchasing special rubbish bags.
You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.
Reasons To DisagreeSome people choose to use other rubbish collection agents rather than the council ones, why should they susidies the council rubbish collection? 4 September 2005
there should be a solid incentive for households to reduce the amount of non-recyclable waste they produce 2 January 2006
Recycling should be free to encourage people to recycle, whilst rubbish collection should cost people per bag or volume so that less waste is generated. 24 March 2006
You make the waste? You pay for the waste. 20 April 2006
NO! - the only fair way is for the user to pay the full cost. 22 December 2009
Some people can't afford or be bothered to buy bags, but if people had to buy their own bags it would be an incentive to reduce, reuse and recycle more. 27 December 2009
|
Reasons To AgreeSome tenants get short of cash and can't pay even the small cost of a council rubbish bag. It is for the benefit of neighbours and the general public health, that residential rubbish is collected for free. 30 August 2005
Purchasing bags discourages proper disposal as there is an inherent risk of people getting rid of rubbish in improper ways 26 March 2006
I thought it alread was paid by rates. Our rates are so high, the money must be going somewhere. I guess they're just not going to actual services. 10 November 2006
|
Reasons for Remain Neutral
No reasons have yet been given to remain neutral.My View
You can make your comments once you have voted.
You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.
